Peter Harvey - Bitcoin Miner - Bitcoin Inc. | LinkedIn

"Bitcoin XT and Bitcoin Unlimited are aligned in the belief that consensus-level changes should be activated only after ratification by the miners. 'Take-it-or-leave-it' bundles, and hard-fork deadlines, are adding unnecessary stress and politicking." - Peter Rizun

submitted by throwawayo12345 to btc [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Core's Peter Todd: 'The problem with mined sidechains is that the segwit "anyone-can-spend" issue is a reality, not FUD, and miners can steal sidechain funds; the reason why segwit doesn't have that problem is because full nodes prevent the theft, but sidechains have only miner-trusting SPV'

Bitcoin Core's Peter Todd: 'The problem with mined sidechains is that the segwit submitted by michelson01 to btc [link] [comments]

Peter Todd: "With some miners threatening 51% attacks against Bitcoin, researching a PoW change is a good backup plan.: btcpowupdate.org"

Peter Todd: submitted by TomorrowisToday_ to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Peter Todd: "With some miners threatening 51% attacks against Bitcoin, researching a PoW change is a good backup plan.: btcpowupdate.org"

Peter Todd: submitted by Windowly to btc [link] [comments]

Peter Todd on Twitter: "tl;dr: Bitcoin Classic is proposing to let a majority of miners steal any coins they want too. #thatsnotbitcoin https://t.co/5kl7pxOSEM"

Peter Todd on Twitter: submitted by BitcoinHR to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Peter R refuses to remove block size limit from Bitcoin Unlimited. Claims that miners want to be able to set a limit.

Peter R refuses to remove block size limit from Bitcoin Unlimited. Claims that miners want to be able to set a limit. submitted by byzantinepeasant to btc [link] [comments]

"Bitcoin XT and Bitcoin Unlimited are aligned in the belief that consensus-level changes should be activated only after ratification by the miners. 'Take-it-or-leave-it' bundles, and hard-fork deadlines, are adding unnecessary stress and politicking." - Peter Rizun

submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Peter R refuses to remove block size limit from Bitcoin Unlimited. Claims that miners want to be able to set a limit.

Peter R refuses to remove block size limit from Bitcoin Unlimited. Claims that miners want to be able to set a limit. submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Shameless liars Peter Todd and Samson Mow claim that Chinese miners are threatening top spend $100 million to kill Bitcoin

https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/827792587339620352
The truth is completely different:
Cryptocoinsnews: Luke-Jr has threatened a PoW hardfork if maxblocksize is increased. It appears to play some role in the hesitancy of other miners, but Zhuoer thinks he has a solution. He says:

“We have prepared $100 million USD to kill the small fork of CoreCoin, no matter what POW algorithm, sha256 or scrypt or X11 or any other GPU algorithm. Show me your money. We very much welcome a CoreCoin change to POS.”

...
Does anybody feel the desire to stay unforked with such people?
submitted by Shock_The_Stream to btc [link] [comments]

Peter Rizun: I support @CobraBitcoins proposal to rewrite the Bitcoin (BTC) white paper. It gives the impression that BTC is cash, nodes are miners, SPV is for users, and that hash power both enforces and defines the consensus rules. This applies only to BCH. BTC needs its own white paper.

Peter Rizun: I support @CobraBitcoins proposal to rewrite the Bitcoin (BTC) white paper. It gives the impression that BTC is cash, nodes are miners, SPV is for users, and that hash power both enforces and defines the consensus rules. This applies only to BCH. BTC needs its own white paper. submitted by HiIAMCaptainObvious to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Core's Peter Todd: 'The problem with mined sidechains is that the segwit "anyone-can-spend" issue is a reality, not FUD, and miners can steal sidechain funds; the reason why segwit doesn't have that problem is because full nodes prevent the theft, but sidechains have only miner-trusting SPV'

Bitcoin Core's Peter Todd: 'The problem with mined sidechains is that the segwit submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Peter Todd on Twitter: "tl;dr: Bitcoin Classic is proposing to let a majority of miners steal any coins they want too. #thatsnotbitcoin https://t.co/5kl7pxOSEM"

Peter Todd on Twitter: submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Peter Rizun tells miners to force a hard fork by attacking the original chain /r/Bitcoin

Peter Rizun tells miners to force a hard fork by attacking the original chain /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Peter Todd: "With some miners threatening 51% attacks against Bitcoin, researching a PoW change is a good backup plan.: btcpowupdate.org"

Peter Todd: submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Shameless liars Peter Todd and Samson Mow claim that Chinese miners are threatening top spend $100 million to kill Bitcoin /r/btc

Shameless liars Peter Todd and Samson Mow claim that Chinese miners are threatening top spend $100 million to kill Bitcoin /btc submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

05-15 07:51 - 'This was said by AFAIK Peter Todd in a Q&A on a Chinese forum. I'm on mobile and don't have the link on hand, sorry. / It would certainly be a good choice for the miners to do so if they want a guarantee that the...' by /u/aaaaaaaarrrrrgh removed from /r/Bitcoin within 147-152min

'''
This was said by AFAIK Peter Todd in a Q&A on a Chinese forum. I'm on mobile and don't have the link on hand, sorry.
It would certainly be a good choice for the miners to do so if they want a guarantee that the hardfork will happen.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: aaaaaaaarrrrrgh
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Miners: You'll (very likely) need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node soon to support BIP66 | Peter Todd | Jun 12 2015

Peter Todd on Jun 12 2015:
Summary
The BIP66 soft-fork recently passed the 75% support threshold. This
means that 75% of the hashing power has upgraded to support BIP66; 25%
of the hashing power has not. Once 95% of the hashing power has
upgraded, blocks created by the 5% who have not upgraded will be
rejected.
If you operate a pool, solo-mine, or mine on p2pool you'll very likely
need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node to support the BIP66 soft-fork,
or your blocks will be rejected. If you only sell your hashing power to
a centralized pool you do not need to do anything.
How does the Bitcoin protocol measure BIP66 support?
Miners that have upgraded to support BIP66 create blocks with the
version field set to 3; non-upgraded miners set the version to 2.
Bitcoin Core measures BIP66 support by counting how many blocks with
version >= 3 exist in the blockchain within the last 1000 blocks.
If 750 out of the last 1000 blocks support BIP66, blocks with the
version set to >= 3 that do not follow the BIP66 rules are rejected; if
950 out of the last 1000 blocks support BIP66, blocks with version < 3
are rejected.
When will the 95% threshold be reached?
It's unknown exactly when the 95% threshold will be reached. The BIP34
soft-fork went from 75% to 95% support in a about two weeks, however
more or less time is possible; it's possible that the 95% threshold will
be reached in just a few days.
How can I monitor BIP66 adoption?
See Pieter Wuille's graphs:
[http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver-ever.png](http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver-ever.png) 
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver-50k.png
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver-10k.png
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver-2k.png
The 'ever' and '50k' graphs show the 75% and 95% thresholds.
What software supports support BIP66?
Bitcoin Core releases later than v0.10.0 support BIP66.
In addition, v0.9.5 supports BIP66, however we recommend that you
upgrade to v0.10.2
If you run a pool, you may also need to upgrade your pool software as
well. For instance, eloipool versions prior to May 22nd 2015, git commit
f5f4ea636fb38f38e6d9a04aad1f04427556a4bc, do not support BIP66. (For
Eloipool, cb8a5e8fbb4bfdfe9e35f670082603caff65e1b2 is a clean merge that
should work for any branch more recent than 2013 April 6)
Solo miners and decentralised miners using GBT need to also update their
mining software to a currently supported version of BFGMiner to get
support for v3 blocks. The official BFGMiner binaries include this
update with 5.1.0, 4.10.2, and 3.10.9.
What is BIP66?
BIP66 - "Strict DER signatures" - is a soft-fork that tightens the rules
for signature verification, specifically the way that signatures are
encoded. The Bitcoin Core implementation currently relies on OpenSSL for
signature validation, which means it implicitly defines Bitcoin's block
validity rules. Unfortunately, OpenSSL is not designed for
consensus-critical behaviour (it does not guarantee bug-for-bug
compatibility between versions), and thus changes to it can - and have -
affected Bitcoin software. (see CVE-2014-8275)
By tightening these rules BIP66 reduces the risk that changes to OpenSSL
will cause forks in the Bitcoin blockchain, as seen previously by the
March 2013 fork. Secondly reducing our dependency on OpenSSL is a step
towards replacing OpenSSL with libsecp256k1, a signature validation
library from Pieter Wuille and Gregory Maxwell, that is designed for
consensus-critical applications, as well as being significantly faster
than OpenSSL.
Is it possible that the BIP66 soft-fork will not happen?
In theory yes, though it is unlikely and rejection of BIP66 would be a
very ugly process. Unfortunately the existing soft-fork mechanism
provides no mechanism for a soft-fork to expire, so once set in motion
there is no clean way to stop a soft-fork.
There is a proposal from Wuille/Maxwell/Todd, to reform how soft-forks
are adopted that aims to fix this issue, as well as allow multiple
soft-forks be adopted in parallel:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07863.html

'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000127ab1d576dc851f374424f1269c4700ccaba2c42d97e778
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150611/d56b6e78/attachment.sig>
original: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008578.html
submitted by bitcoin-devlist-bot to bitcoin_devlist [link] [comments]

CLTV/CSV/etc. deployment considerations due to XT/Not-BitcoinXT miners | Peter Todd | Aug 19 2015 /r/bitcoin_devlist

CLTV/CSV/etc. deployment considerations due to XT/Not-BitcoinXT miners | Peter Todd | Aug 19 2015 /bitcoin_devlist submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Miners: You'll (very likely) need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node soon to support BIP66 | Peter Todd | Jun 12 2015 /r/bitcoin_devlist

Miners: You'll (very likely) need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node soon to support BIP66 | Peter Todd | Jun 12 2015 /bitcoin_devlist submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

#Bitcoin explained in 2 minutes by Erik Voorhees

#Bitcoin explained in 2 minutes by Erik Voorhees submitted by eljaboom to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

"mining death spiral" broken BTC all data are good

Just two months after the bitcoin halving in May, both the hash rate and the difficulty level dropped from their halving lows to record highs. The latest level of difficulty was + 9.89% , after the bitcoin hash rate hit a record high last week, hitting a record high of 17.35 T on July 13.
Earlier this year, some analysts predicted that halving bitcoin rewards would lead to a flood of unprofitable miners surrendering.
https://preview.redd.it/y0wh2vra66b51.jpg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bd2c408f93c0eceb74473e99f7c3d88502d25b46

https://preview.redd.it/g6caelbc66b51.jpg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=16003f2266a79c32049a4fdf712c06e3372e6f76
In fact, after the halving, the Hash rate immediately dropped significantly, and the difficulty of mining was subsequently reduced twice. But last month mining difficulties rose 14.95 per cent, almost reversing the previous two declines. With Hash rates and difficulty levels now at all-time highs, any concerns about the halving effect now seem unfounded.
The new high flies in the face of talk of a "mining death spiral" , common in the period before supply cuts in May. The doomsayers at the time claimed that miners would be flocking to shut down their equipment. Dan Held, Kraken's business development director, said Fud about the demise of the bitcoin network is now being debunked once again. Instead of leaving the network, the bitcoin miners are actively investing in more efficient ASIC miners. As early as April, bitland began selling its next-generation mining machines (S19 and S19 Pro) with computing power of up to 115TH / S. Another notable trend is the U.S. bid for China's mining crown, with schemes like Peter Thiel's Layer1 reaching 30% of its total capacity in 2021.
In the past few months, Bitcoin has traded between $9,000 and $10,000. The long and short sides have been deadlocked since early May, with each attempt to break out of that range proving short-lived. This has led to cryptocurrency volatility at levels not seen in a year. Even at this stage, bitcoin has enjoyed tremendous fundamental growth.
submitted by dengtaDTB to u/dengtaDTB [link] [comments]

Let's have a show of hands - Who supports the IFP (dev-tax)?

Or, more importantly, who is against it? It seems to me that almost the entire community is against this major change but it would be good if this is made clear in one place. It seems also that most of the people against this are well-known OG bitcoiners.
If you are against the current proposal as outlined by BitcoinABC HERE please make a top-level comment below (i.e. not a reply to another comment) stating:
Against IFP
If you run a BCH business, piece of infrastructure or project please add:
- from [INSERT PROJECT NAME]
I will add all names to a list below.
It is important to know this as this is what BCH is potentially set to lose should this go through. My hope is that if miners can see how much of the ecosystem is against this then they will reconsider.

Businesses, Infrastructure, Projects & Institutions

Developers

Individuals

submitted by singularity87 to btc [link] [comments]

BITCOIN GENERATOR FREE BITCOIN MINER 2020 100% LEGIT BITCOIN MONEY ADD Bitcoin miner system 2020 Real Working atNWs5LYN0M BITCOIN MINING ,METHOD OF MINING ,TECHNIQUES , EARN FREE ... BITCOIN VA PETER LES 10.500$ !? btc analyse technique crypto monnaie Desktop bitcoin miner break down/ How i mine Crypto / Earn gift cards online with paying websites

“I do think Bitcoin is the first encrypted money that has the potential to do something like change the world.” Skip to content +971552305571 / WhatsApp: +971555592696 View Williams Peter’s profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community. Williams has 1 job listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Williams’ connections and jobs at similar companies. View Peter Brennan’s profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community. Peter has 1 job listed on their profile. See the complete profile on LinkedIn and discover Peter’s connections and jobs at similar companies. Peter Mittas Bitcoin miner and investor at Global Income Solutions Laval, Quebec, Canada 500+ connections Peter Scott Bitcoin Miner at financialmarketsonline United States 0 connections. Join to Connect. financialmarketsonline. Report this profile; Experience. Bitcoin Miner financialmarketsonline.

[index] [5276] [13666] [6716] [19634] [3071] [14406] [17968] [3146] [17014] [22322]

BITCOIN GENERATOR FREE BITCOIN MINER 2020 100% LEGIT BITCOIN MONEY ADD

Best Bitcoin Miner software For Pc 2020 ... Competition is for Losers with Peter Thiel (How to Start a Startup 2014: 5) - Duration: 50:28. Y Combinator Recommended for you. Nous voyons en détail chaque support, résistance, et figure envisageable durant ce fameux dump ou pump BITCOIN ! Pour faire un don en EURO ou en BITCOIN : https://crypto-monnaie-analyse-fr.mys... new bitcoin site daily 0.001btc without investment watch videos,ptc ads and surf ads LINK: https://bit.ly/2NKJgMw 1$ Bonus Bitcoin Mining Site And other coin Without investment 2020 Bitcoin Miner Machine The State of Bitcoin Mining Best Bitcoin Miners CGMiner EasyMiner MultiMiner BFGMiner NiceHash GUI Miner DiabloMiner ... Peter Schultz - Duration: 45:41. How to generate free Bitcoin 1. Enter your personal Bitcoin Wallet Address – make sure to enter a valid wallet address. It is recommended to generate a new Bitcoin Wallet Address everytime you ...

Flag Counter